This article is stellar, and I agree entirely. Euthanasia is a blight against things good and holy precisely because it forces others into reprehensible actions for exclusively selfish desires. As the author says, a right necessarily begets a duty, and vice versa.
Hearts & Likes
People are able to discern good from evil. More or less everybody will recognize and condemn an atrocity exhibited on their TV screens, provided they have no stake in it. In this respect, social networks present us with a panoramic display of humanity’s certainty in its moral principles. Namely, that’s where thousands upon thousands like the photo of some little, dying “angel” and write condemnatory comments under the picture of some sadist caught poisoning dogs. Whether they are themselves good or evil is immaterial. They passed their judgments and ascertained what is and what is not good. Admittedly, the principles providing them with the capability for moral judgment are rarely explicitly defined. Yet who would doubt, for instance, the sanctity of human life and the obligation to respect its final act as unquestionable values? The virtual heart and like under the photo of the gravely ill child…
View original post 3,986 more words
[…] M. Laurel Originally posted on The Soul of the East:Hearts & Likes People are able to discern good from […]
LikeLike
[…] and financially. Worst of all is the culture which has become so ponerized that a variety of degeneracies are now considered normal and healthy. Those who suppose the rise of a Western world do so through […]
LikeLike